Wow, so let me get this straight: you refuse to even write comments on this because of the "awful" sterotypes. And yet your last post stereotyped all women's studies courses as man-hating. Way to be a hypocrite.
Sorry, but it's grossly inaccurate to depict (ha!) all feminsts as crazy man-hating b*tches and it drives me nuts when people do it.
1) I didn't comment on this one because I realized that anything I'd put on that 2nd page would totally detract from the ridiculousness of the racial stereotyping
2) You can't take my comments all that seriously. Author in "Racist Sterotyping" believes what you read on the page. I, on the other hand, don't actually think women's studies courses are as I commented on the previous entry. I'm just kidding. Sorry for driving you nuts, thanks for commenting.
4 Comments:
Wow, so let me get this straight: you refuse to even write comments on this because of the "awful" sterotypes. And yet your last post stereotyped all women's studies courses as man-hating. Way to be a hypocrite.
Sorry, but it's grossly inaccurate to depict (ha!) all feminsts as crazy man-hating b*tches and it drives me nuts when people do it.
Somewhat correct.
1) I didn't comment on this one because I realized that anything I'd put on that 2nd page would totally detract from the ridiculousness of the racial stereotyping
2) You can't take my comments all that seriously. Author in "Racist Sterotyping" believes what you read on the page. I, on the other hand, don't actually think women's studies courses are as I commented on the previous entry. I'm just kidding. Sorry for driving you nuts, thanks for commenting.
Also, last time I checked, "That's awful" is a comment, as is the writing you see in the left margin.
"the task for Sarah to raie her son..." Sarah isn't the one who has a son...
Post a Comment
<< Home